After the Common Core State Standards has been adapted, more
educators emphasize on the use of technology in the classroom and begin to
shift from traditional lecture-based to interactive and integrated curriculum. Web-based
resources and computer software such as GSP (Geometry Sketch Pad) become popular
and more teachers begin to integrate them into their lessons. From what I have
learned from all of my education courses, I come up with the conclusion that
many students do not like math or can’t see the purpose of learning it derive
from the lack interactions between students and teachers, and irrelevancy between
the content and students’ lives. When I was in high school, my math teachers
would just write notes and formulas all over the board, and then give us several
examples to work on. That was the lesson, and not much interaction went on
during the lessons because everyone was just busy copying down the notes. Without
relating the content to students’ lives, students will not see the purpose of
learning it. Online resources such as the free interactive learning sites
called the Illuminations are capable of making the abstract content more
accessible and relevant to what students experience in their everyday lives. Students
are able to explore how completing the square works using the Algebra Tiles
application, and graph quadratic functions using the graphing tool. As a
result, I strongly believe that integrating technology into the classroom can
definitely improve mathematics teaching, but the key is that making a
successful transition is hard. Writing notes and formulas on the board is how
many teachers used to teach Mathematics for the past twenty years, so it is
often hard to change if they lack the knowledge that we have now about the use
of technology in a classroom. Therefore, I think the key to make that transition
is to educate the teachers on how to integrate technology effectively into
their lessons first. Otherwise, all the effort that was spent on bringing in
technology such as the SmartBoard into the classroom is just a waste of money
and time. I have observed several different math classes already, and realized
that the SmartBoard is nothing more than a piece of furniture for decorative
purpose. Therefore, we must educate the teachers first in order to guarantee
that students will have a meaningful and interactive learning experience.
Sharon,
ReplyDeleteI had a very similar experience in my high school math classes. I have never received a lower grade than I did in geometry. I wish my teacher made the class relevant to everyday life. In my geometry class the smart-board also sat unused. The smart-board is such a great tool that has so much potential, but I see many of them go unused. I am sure that the smart-board could have been used to help provide the class and myself with a better understanding of the subject matter. Unfortunately, the way I learned geometry was by failing it. My teacher only wrote the formulas on the board and did very little explaining. Even when I would go for extra help the material would not stick. If my teacher incorporated technology into the classroom and made geometry relevant to me in everyday life, I may have gotten a better grade.
You have mentioned that SmartBoard is piece of furniture, but honestly I don't think so, I've used SmartBoard, and it was fun using it. I disliked math before, but when my teacher used SmartBoard in class, just little bit it has motivated me, it was fun.
ReplyDelete